General >> General Chat >> Spirituality & mysticism
Spirituality & mysticism
| back to top |
Posted 2 months ago Classification of things. Thing are either Impercieveable (angles & spirits etc)/Percievable. Percievable thing are either nonliving (Dust & Stones etc)/living. Living thing are either Insenceable( Plants)/senceable. Senceable thing are either Nonintelectuals( animals)/intelectuals (Humans). Intelectuals are either ignorent/knowledgeable. Knowledgeable are either injustified/justified. |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago Yes, there is an opposite for every axiom. |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago Who decides which is which? Who makes these divisions? And where do these things come from, are you saying that they were put here at one time, and have remained unchanged? I disagree, and say that all your classifications are arbitrary, biased and false. I would, however, love to hear your reasoning. |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago Quite clear living is living. It is not me who makes the divissions. Divissions are already there & nothing remains unchange. Yes theere is posibility that what I percieve nonliving is actually living. r |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago Marylou2882 says ...
|
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago Palmqvist says ...
humanity grows in the lap of animality & spiriyuality grows inthe lap of humanity. |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago Marylou2882 says ...
Every thing has two opposite pole and normalcy lies in between. |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago Dr_Iqbal_Nazar says ... Every thing has two opposite pole ( one being posative & other negative )and normalcy lies ion between. Marylou2882 says ... Normalcy is used chiefly to denote a normal, healthy state of affairs politically and economically. For example: After the war, the country slowly returned to normalcy. So I ask, how would positive and negative fit this schema? |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago If we look at comune. Comunism on one end and western capitalism on other. Western cpitalism has broken the basic unit of comune, the family, stressing a lot on individual right & comunism totally denies individual right. now peace & war. Peace being posative & war negative. Being ready for war but not entering in to it is normal. what is the diference normalcy & normality ? |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago Dr_Iqbal_Nazar says ...
|
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago Palmqvist says ...
What appears false to you & what resoning you want to hear. you are wellcome to disagree & it is good that you give me a chance to explain myself. |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago Marylou2882 says ...
Dr_Iqbal_Nazar says Wow very informative. I mean commune. Pardon me, english is not my language. |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago Dr_Iqbal_Nazar says ...
|
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago The idealogy of weakness is that if someone slaps one on the face One should ask to for one more slap yhat is one axtreme. the other extreme is "Might is right". what would be neutral in this case. |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago We are draggedfrom the topic. I think I am left alone. Hay is there any one arroud. |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago Dr_Iqbal_Nazar says ...
|
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago Now here is where both extremes are Negative. So I was wrong saying that every thing has two extremes one being posative & other negative. So proved it is worng & thanks for putting me right. Might is right is like, might being right, justifies,brave, honest & all good qualities. On the other hand weakness is being wrong, unjustified , coward & so on. this mean to give another slap on the face of coward and let him die. No no no. Rather we should support weak-ones & make em powerful. thus remaining between the lines. I hope I rightly explaining things. |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago Thanks for the explanation. |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago I am surprised, people like German Nitzshay, they belive the idealogy of "Might being right" |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago Becoming spiritually strong is practiced all over the world and among all the tpes of people. |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago "The ability to do something does not make it right. We are capable of many actions that most contend are unacceptable–rape, abuse, murder, etc. If we have any claim to "superiority," it comes from our ability to act according to moral principles, guided by justice, fairness, and compassion. But we deny our moral ability when we selfishly harm others." Therefore, Might Is Not Always Right. |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago More over ,might is right sounds like law of the jungle. |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago Marylou2882 says ...
Iqbal says I think Iqbal say because I am saying. Morality & action. we are responsible for our action not of thinking / immaginations. Besides morality our actions are dirrected by intetelligence/ pleasure obtaining/knowledge/ Faith. Preyers (spelling) & morality are two main factors that increase our spiritual strenght. |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago I'm quoting from something I read: The first approach, “might makes right”, emphasizes the importance of authority for creating liberal peace, especially the role played by a democratic hegemon and liberal major powers. The second approach, “right makes might”, traces the evolution of the systemic democratic peace to shifts in morality and liberal norms, drawing from work by Rawls (1999) and Wendt (1999). We compare and contrast these two broad theoretical tales, argue that both “might” and “right” are important, and conclude with some thoughts for future development of systemic democratic peace theory. |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago If we look from other angle. Let peace be one extreme and war being the other. 100% staying at one extreme of peace, will bring no peace.So now getting prepaired for war ( attaining might ) but not entering in to the war (the other extreme) can bring peace. how far might making right contrbute to evolution, of Democratic system, for peace. The only problem remaining on my side is Democrazy. |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago The "majority rule" is often described as a characteristic feature of democracy, but without responsible government it is possible for the rights of a minority to be abused by the "tyranny of the majority". An essential process in representative democracies are competitive elections, that are fair both substantively and procedurally. Furthermore, freedom of political expression, freedom of speech and freedom of the press are essential so that citizens are informed and able to vote in their personal interests. If we have fear of the majority, then, we must look to our faith to overcome the atrocities that are imposed upon us and peacefully fight for what is right. Right is Might. |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago Might may bring right. and Right can be observed in two forms/ meanings 1. right meaning not being wrong . this is the form when we talk about Might is right. 2. Right in the form of e.g. human right. ( I am having difficulty explaining this form e.g. I have right to live) . I think this is the form when we talk of Democacy. 1. Majority are fools (exuse me ), illitrate, ignorant. A pure fact. Can we afford to alow them to run Government. 2. For each and every type of job a qualified person is required. Presidential job does not require any qualification. this is irretional again |
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago Body can be in six states Either body is
|
| back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago Farsi poetry Nothing like words & education, in the office of mystic only a white pure heart. Like snow. |
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago Dr_Iqbal_Nazar says ...
I have two questions for you: 1. Why do you view everything as having only one dimension? 2. Is normalcy always the highest good? Dr_Iqbal_Nazar says... 1. Majority are fools (exuse me ), illitrate, ignorant. A pure fact. Can we afford to alow them to run Government. Ignorant, maybe. Illiterate, no. The facts would disagree. www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2103.html Dr_Iqbal_Nazar says... 2. For each and every type of job a qualified person is required. Presidential job does not require any qualification. this is irretional again The qualification is that the people of the democracy agree that he can lead the country.
|
